Morocco vs Sweden: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Morocco
2,034
in 2025
Sweden
1,585
in 2025
Morocco rank
36th
Sweden rank
38th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Morocco
- Sweden
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 2,034 against 1,585 in Sweden, a difference of 449.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.3 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sweden ahead.
Morocco ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 38th of 78 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 205.57 | 2,997 | 2,791 | Sweden |
| 1970s | 259.65 | 2,434 | 2,174 | Sweden |
| 1980s | 374.09 | 3,367 | 2,993 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 716.47 | 3,688 | 2,972 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1,297 | 3,569 | 2,272 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1,370 | 2,496 | 1,126 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 2,158 | 1,722 | 436.36 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Morocco or Sweden?
- Morocco, at 2,034 against 1,585 in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Morocco and Sweden?
- 449, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Sweden?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
- How do Morocco and Sweden rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Morocco ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 38th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.