Netherlands vs Slovenia: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Netherlands
2,871
in 2025
Slovenia
2,586
in 2025
Netherlands rank
26th
Slovenia rank
28th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Netherlands
- Slovenia
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 2,871 against 2,586 in Slovenia, a difference of 285.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Slovenia ahead.
Netherlands ranks 26th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 79 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,260 | 8,218 | 1,958 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 5,748 | 8,667 | 2,919 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 5,820 | 6,867 | 1,048 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 2,980 | 4,266 | 1,286 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Netherlands or Slovenia?
- Netherlands, at 2,871 against 2,586 in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Netherlands and Slovenia?
- 285, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Slovenia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Netherlands and Slovenia rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Netherlands ranks 26th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.