New Zealand vs Philippines: Fossil fuel cons per capita
New Zealand
2,291
in 2025
Philippines
2,222
in 2025
New Zealand rank
33rd
Philippines rank
35th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2,291 against 2,222 in Philippines, a difference of 69.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 35th of 79 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,425 | 10.48 | 6,415 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 5,225 | 16.04 | 5,209 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 4,187 | 144.51 | 4,043 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 3,803 | 328.66 | 3,475 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 5,038 | 670.29 | 4,367 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 3,576 | 1,298 | 2,278 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 2,752 | 2,122 | 630 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 2,291 against 2,222 in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 69, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- New Zealand ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 35th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.