Norway vs Romania: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Norway
1,525
in 2025
Romania
1,301
in 2025
Norway rank
40th
Romania rank
42nd
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Norway
- Romania
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1,525 against 1,301 in Romania, a difference of 224.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Romania ahead.
Norway ranks 40th and Romania ranks 42nd of 79 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,330 | 3,224 | 894.35 | Romania |
| 1970s | 2,676 | 5,150 | 2,474 | Romania |
| 1980s | 2,790 | 7,608 | 4,818 | Romania |
| 1990s | 2,354 | 5,110 | 2,756 | Romania |
| 2000s | 1,897 | 4,726 | 2,829 | Romania |
| 2010s | 1,809 | 3,573 | 1,764 | Romania |
| 2020s | 1,626 | 1,849 | 222.74 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Norway or Romania?
- Norway, at 1,525 against 1,301 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Norway and Romania?
- 224, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Romania?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
- How do Norway and Romania rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Norway ranks 40th and Romania ranks 42nd of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.