Singapore vs Sri Lanka: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Singapore
673.05
in 2025
Sri Lanka
656.19
in 2025
Singapore rank
48th
Sri Lanka rank
51st
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Singapore
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 673.05 against 656.19 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 16.86.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 48th and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 79 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.93 | 0 | 24.93 | Singapore |
| 1970s | 17.63 | 0.5945 | 17.04 | Singapore |
| 1980s | 31.04 | 8.6 | 22.44 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 38.96 | 0.221 | 38.74 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 14.06 | 19.89 | 5.83 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 701.61 | 469.57 | 232.04 | Singapore |
| 2020s | 778.97 | 745.18 | 33.79 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Singapore or Sri Lanka?
- Singapore, at 673.05 against 656.19 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Singapore and Sri Lanka?
- 16.86, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Sri Lanka?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
- How do Singapore and Sri Lanka rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Singapore ranks 48th and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.