Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Slovakia: Fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate

Iran, Islamic Republic of
0.8779 % change on previous year
in 2025
Slovakia
0.7673 % change on previous year
in 2025
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
129th
Slovakia rank
132nd

Fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate over time

  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Slovakia
-1001020196619952025

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 0.8779 % change on previous year against 0.7673 % change on previous year in Slovakia, a difference of 0.1106 % change on previous year.

That makes Iran, Islamic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.

Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 129th and Slovakia ranks 132nd of 218 countries.

Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Republic of Slovakia Difference Ahead
1960s 9.79 % change on previous year 5.57 % change on previous year 4.21 % change on previous year Iran, Islamic Republic of
1970s 12.36 % change on previous year 5.1 % change on previous year 7.26 % change on previous year Iran, Islamic Republic of
1980s 5.54 % change on previous year 0.2145 % change on previous year 5.32 % change on previous year Iran, Islamic Republic of
1990s 6.67 % change on previous year -2.69 % change on previous year 9.36 % change on previous year Iran, Islamic Republic of
2000s 6.04 % change on previous year -1.01 % change on previous year 7.06 % change on previous year Iran, Islamic Republic of
2010s 3.07 % change on previous year -0.8758 % change on previous year 3.94 % change on previous year Iran, Islamic Republic of
2020s 2.32 % change on previous year -1.8 % change on previous year 4.12 % change on previous year Iran, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Slovakia?
Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 0.8779 % change on previous year against 0.7673 % change on previous year in Slovakia as of 2025.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Slovakia?
0.1106 % change on previous year, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Slovakia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Slovakia rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate?
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 129th and Slovakia ranks 132nd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Slovakia: Fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-annual-growth-rate/iran-islamic-rep/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-annual-growth-rate/iran-islamic-rep/slovak-republic/">Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Slovakia: Fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,353 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Fossil fuel consumption. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.