Hong Kong vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre

Hong Kong
0.0462 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.1717 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
4th
Singapore rank
2nd

Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Singapore
00.050.10.150.2198020012023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.1717 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0462 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.1255 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 3.7 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Singapore ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 205 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre —
1990s 0.0129 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0164 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0251 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0904 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0653 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.028 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1502 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1222 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0456 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1788 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1332 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.1717 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0462 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Singapore?
0.1255 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Singapore?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Singapore rank globally for fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-by-fuel-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-by-fuel-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,129 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption by fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.