Afghanistan vs Solomon Islands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Afghanistan
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
185th
Solomon Islands rank
187th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Solomon Islands
0000198020012023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 185th and Solomon Islands ranks 187th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Solomon Islands?
Afghanistan, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Solomon Islands?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Solomon Islands?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Solomon Islands rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 185th and Solomon Islands ranks 187th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Solomon Islands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/solomon-islands/">Afghanistan vs Solomon Islands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.