Aruba vs South Korea: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea
0.03 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
13th
South Korea rank
10th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • South Korea
00.010.020.03196519942023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0.03 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0038 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was South Korea ahead.

Aruba ranks 13th and South Korea ranks 10th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba South Korea Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0065 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0073 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0153 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 0.0299 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0071 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 0.0264 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0297 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 0.0258 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0303 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0045 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Aruba or South Korea?
South Korea, at 0.03 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Aruba and South Korea?
0.0038 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Korea?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Aruba and South Korea rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 13th and South Korea ranks 10th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs South Korea: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/aruba/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/aruba/korea-rep/">Aruba vs South Korea: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.