Aruba vs Netherlands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands
0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
13th
Netherlands rank
15th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Netherlands
00.010.020.03196519942023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0035 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Netherlands ahead.

Aruba ranks 13th and Netherlands ranks 15th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Netherlands Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0065 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0257 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0192 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0291 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0124 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 0.0299 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0321 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0023 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 0.0264 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0299 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0034 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 0.0258 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0247 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Aruba or Netherlands?
Aruba, at 0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Aruba and Netherlands?
0.0035 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Netherlands?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Netherlands rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 13th and Netherlands ranks 15th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Netherlands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/aruba/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/aruba/netherlands/">Aruba vs Netherlands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.