Australia vs Peru: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Australia
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
152nd
Peru rank
150th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Peru
0000196519942023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 152nd and Peru ranks 150th of 205 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Australia or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Australia and Peru?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Australia and Peru rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 152nd and Peru ranks 150th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Peru: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/australia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/australia/peru/">Australia vs Peru: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.