Bahamas vs Belarus: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
78th
Belarus rank
80th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Belarus
00.0010.0010.0020.002198020012023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Bahamas ranks 78th and Belarus ranks 80th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Belarus?
Bahamas, at 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Belarus?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Belarus rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 78th and Belarus ranks 80th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Belarus: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/belarus/">Bahamas vs Belarus: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.