Bangladesh vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Bangladesh
0.004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0044 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
40th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
37th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.0010.0020.0030.004197119972023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0044 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 40th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 37th of 205 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0034 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0027 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0038 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0042 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0044 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 40th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 37th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bangladesh vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.