Barbados vs Naoero: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Barbados
0.0153 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
19th
Naoero rank
17th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Naoero
0.010.0150.020.0250.03198020012023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0153 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Naoero ahead.

Barbados ranks 19th and Naoero ranks 17th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Naoero in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Naoero Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0112 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0287 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0175 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Naoero
1990s 0.0134 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0296 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0162 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Naoero
2000s 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0159 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0164 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0147 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0137 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0161 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0024 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Barbados or Naoero?
Naoero, at 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0153 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Barbados and Naoero?
0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Naoero?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Naoero rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 19th and Naoero ranks 17th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Naoero: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/barbados/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/barbados/naoero/">Barbados vs Naoero: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.