Belarus vs Croatia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
80th
Croatia rank
82nd

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Croatia
00.0010.0010.0020.002199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 80th and Croatia ranks 82nd of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Croatia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Belarus or Croatia?
Belarus, at 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Belarus and Croatia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 80th and Croatia ranks 82nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.