Belgium vs Naoero: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Belgium
0.0159 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
18th
Naoero rank
17th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Naoero
00.010.020.03198020012023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0159 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Naoero ahead.

Belgium ranks 18th and Naoero ranks 17th of 205 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Naoero Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0201 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0159 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0042 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.0184 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0147 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0037 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 0.0167 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0161 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Belgium or Naoero?
Naoero, at 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0159 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Belgium and Naoero?
0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Naoero?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Naoero rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 18th and Naoero ranks 17th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Naoero: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/belgium/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/belgium/naoero/">Belgium vs Naoero: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.