Bermuda vs Malta: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Bermuda
0.0438 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
8th
Malta rank
6th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Malta
0.0250.050.0750.10.125198020012023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0438 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 0.0793 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 2.8 times Bermuda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bermuda ahead.

Bermuda ranks 8th and Malta ranks 6th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Malta Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0465 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0189 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0276 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bermuda
1990s 0.0412 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0313 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0098 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bermuda
2000s 0.0529 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0689 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0507 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0969 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0462 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.0415 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1152 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0737 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Bermuda or Malta?
Malta, at 0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0438 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Bermuda and Malta?
0.0793 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Malta?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Malta rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 8th and Malta ranks 6th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Malta: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/malta/">Bermuda vs Malta: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.