Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
167th
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Zimbabwe
00000198020012023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Bolivia, Plurinational State of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 167th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 205 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 167th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.