Bosnia and Herzegovina vs French Polynesia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia
0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
72nd
French Polynesia rank
74th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • French Polynesia
00.0010.0010.0020.002198020012023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd and French Polynesia ranks 74th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and French Polynesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or French Polynesia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and French Polynesia?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and French Polynesia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and French Polynesia rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd and French Polynesia ranks 74th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs French Polynesia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/french-polynesia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs French Polynesia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.