Burkina Faso vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
170th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
169th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00000198020012023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 169th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 169th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/">Burkina Faso vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.