Cayman Islands vs Nauru: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
0.0145 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru
0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
20th
Nauru rank
17th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Nauru
00.010.020.03198020012023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0145 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.0023 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.2 times Cayman Islands's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 20th and Nauru ranks 17th of 205 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Nauru Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0025 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0287 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 0.0055 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0296 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0241 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 0.0095 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0159 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0064 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 0.0112 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0147 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0035 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 0.0128 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0161 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Nauru?
Nauru, at 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0145 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cayman Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Nauru?
0.0023 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Nauru?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Nauru rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 20th and Nauru ranks 17th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Nauru: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/naoero/">Cayman Islands vs Nauru: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.