China vs Malaysia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

China
0.0041 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0037 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
39th
Malaysia rank
42nd

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Malaysia
00.0010.0020.0030.004196519942023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0041 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0037 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was China ahead.

China ranks 39th and Malaysia ranks 42nd of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
1970s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
1980s 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
1990s 0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0023 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0032 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0039 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, China or Malaysia?
China, at 0.0041 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0037 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between China and Malaysia?
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Malaysia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do China and Malaysia rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
China ranks 39th and Malaysia ranks 42nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Malaysia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/china/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/china/malaysia/">China vs Malaysia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.