Colombia vs Finland: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Colombia
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
129th
Finland rank
128th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Finland
0000.0010.0010.001196519942023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 129th and Finland ranks 128th of 205 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Colombia or Finland?
Finland, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Colombia and Finland?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Finland?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Finland rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 129th and Finland ranks 128th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Finland: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/colombia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/colombia/finland/">Colombia vs Finland: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.