Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
108th
Tunisia rank
107th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Tunisia
000.0010.001198020012023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Tunisia ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 205 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Tunisia Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Tunisia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tunisia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Tunisia rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tunisia/">Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.