Croatia vs Panama: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Croatia
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
82nd
Panama rank
83rd

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Croatia
  • Panama
0.0010.0010.002198020012023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 82nd and Panama ranks 83rd of 205 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Croatia or Panama?
Croatia, at 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Croatia and Panama?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Panama?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Panama rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Croatia ranks 82nd and Panama ranks 83rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Panama: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/croatia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/croatia/panama/">Croatia vs Panama: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.