Ecuador vs Montenegro: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
113th
Montenegro rank
110th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Montenegro
0000.0010.001196519942023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Ecuador ranks 113th and Montenegro ranks 110th of 205 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Montenegro
2020s 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Montenegro?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 113th and Montenegro ranks 110th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Montenegro: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/montenegro/">Ecuador vs Montenegro: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.