Eritrea vs Namibia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Eritrea
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
193rd
Namibia rank
196th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Eritrea
  • Namibia
00000199020062023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 193rd and Namibia ranks 196th of 205 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eritrea
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eritrea
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Eritrea or Namibia?
Eritrea, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Eritrea and Namibia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Eritrea ranks 193rd and Namibia ranks 196th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Namibia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/">Eritrea vs Namibia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.