Faroe Islands vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
0.0024 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Iran, Islamic Republic of
0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
57th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
59th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
00.0010.0020.003196519942023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 0.0024 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.1 times Iran, Islamic Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 57th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 59th of 205 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Iran, Islamic Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 0.0025 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
Faroe Islands, at 0.0024 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 57th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 59th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/iran-islamic-rep/">Faroe Islands vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.