Gibraltar vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Gibraltar
5.94 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
1.34 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Singapore
0246196519942023

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 5.94 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 1.34 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 4.6 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 4.4 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 205 countries.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 0.3827 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.2304 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1523 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 1.14 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.5327 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.6083 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Gibraltar
2000s 4.82 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.8138 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 4 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Gibraltar
2010s 5.3 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 1.29 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 4.01 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Gibraltar
2020s 5.82 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 1.3 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 4.52 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Gibraltar or Singapore?
Gibraltar, at 5.94 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 1.34 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Gibraltar and Singapore?
4.6 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Singapore?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Gibraltar and Singapore rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Gibraltar ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/singapore/">Gibraltar vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.