Guam vs Mauritius: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Guam
0.01 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0108 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
25th
Mauritius rank
24th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Mauritius
00.010.020.030.04198020012023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0108 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.01 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guam, a difference of 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Guam's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guam ahead.

Guam ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Mauritius Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0163 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0142 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Guam
1990s 0.0239 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0047 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0192 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Guam
2000s 0.0249 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0169 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Guam
2010s 0.0091 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0109 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0087 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0104 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Guam or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.0108 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.01 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guam as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Guam and Mauritius?
0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Mauritius?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Guam and Mauritius rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Mauritius: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/guam/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/guam/mauritius/">Guam vs Mauritius: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.