Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
0.2367 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
4th
Malta rank
6th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Malta
00.10.20.3196519942023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.2367 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.1136 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.9 times Malta's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Malta ranks 6th of 205 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Malta Difference Ahead
1980s 0.1047 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0189 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0858 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.1716 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0313 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1402 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.2547 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0689 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1858 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.3174 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0969 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.2204 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.2292 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.1152 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.114 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Malta?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.2367 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
0.1136 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Malta ranks 6th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.