Iceland vs Uganda: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Iceland
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
162nd
Uganda rank
160th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Uganda
0000196519942023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 162nd and Uganda ranks 160th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Iceland or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Iceland and Uganda?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Uganda?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Uganda rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 162nd and Uganda ranks 160th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Uganda: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/iceland/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/iceland/uganda/">Iceland vs Uganda: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.