Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Iceland
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
162nd
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Zimbabwe
0000196519942023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Iceland or Zimbabwe?
Iceland, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Iceland and Zimbabwe?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/iceland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/iceland/zimbabwe/">Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.