Kiribati vs Sweden: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Kiribati
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
131st
Sweden rank
130th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Sweden
000.0010.0010.001196519942023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 131st and Sweden ranks 130th of 205 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Sweden Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Kiribati or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Kiribati and Sweden?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sweden?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Sweden rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 131st and Sweden ranks 130th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Sweden: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/sweden/">Kiribati vs Sweden: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.