Republic of Korea vs Kuwait: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Republic of Korea
0.03 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait
0.0281 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Republic of Korea rank
10th
Kuwait rank
11th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • Kuwait
00.010.020.03196519942023

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 0.03 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0281 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kuwait, a difference of 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Kuwait ahead.

Republic of Korea ranks 10th and Kuwait ranks 11th of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 4 and Kuwait in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0048 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0037 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kuwait
1970s 0.0028 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0046 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kuwait
1980s 0.006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0069 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kuwait
1990s 0.0153 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0072 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0081 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Republic of Korea
2000s 0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0165 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0062 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Republic of Korea
2010s 0.0297 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.025 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0047 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Republic of Korea
2020s 0.0303 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0262 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0041 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Republic of Korea or Kuwait?
Republic of Korea, at 0.03 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0281 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kuwait as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Republic of Korea and Kuwait?
0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Kuwait?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Republic of Korea and Kuwait rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Republic of Korea ranks 10th and Kuwait ranks 11th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs Kuwait: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/kuwait/">Republic of Korea vs Kuwait: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.