Macau, China vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Macau, China
0.2206 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
1.34 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
5th
Singapore rank
2nd

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
00.511.5196519942023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 1.34 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.2206 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Macau, China, a difference of 1.12 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 6.1 times Macau, China's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 205 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 0.1529 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.2304 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0775 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.2695 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.5327 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.2632 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.2951 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.8138 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.5186 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.2601 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 1.29 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 1.03 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.2156 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 1.3 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 1.08 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 1.34 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.2206 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
1.12 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.