Mali vs Namibia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Mali
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
194th
Namibia rank
196th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Mali
  • Namibia
000000198020012023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

Mali ranks 194th and Namibia ranks 196th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Mali or Namibia?
Mali, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Mali and Namibia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Mali ranks 194th and Namibia ranks 196th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Namibia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/">Mali vs Namibia: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.