Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Malta
0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.032 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
6th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
9th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196519942023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.032 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0911 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 3.9 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 6th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 9th of 205 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0189 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0113 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0076 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.0313 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0171 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0142 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0689 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0345 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0344 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0969 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0421 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0548 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.1152 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0331 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0821 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Malta or Trinidad and Tobago?
Malta, at 0.1231 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.032 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0911 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Malta and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 6th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 9th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.