Nauru vs Netherlands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Nauru
0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands
0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
17th
Netherlands rank
15th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Nauru
  • Netherlands
0.010.0150.020.0250.030.035196519942023

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 0.0059 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.3 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 17th and Netherlands ranks 15th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Netherlands Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0287 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0244 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0043 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 0.0296 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0291 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 0.0159 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0321 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0162 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 0.0147 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0299 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0152 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 0.0161 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0247 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0086 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Nauru or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 0.0227 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0168 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Nauru and Netherlands?
0.0059 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Netherlands?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Netherlands rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Nauru ranks 17th and Netherlands ranks 15th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Netherlands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/naoero/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/naoero/netherlands/">Nauru vs Netherlands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.