Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
179th
Suriname rank
182nd

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Suriname
0000198020012023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Suriname ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 179th and Suriname ranks 182nd of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Suriname Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Suriname?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Suriname rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 179th and Suriname ranks 182nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/suriname/">Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.