Serbia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Serbia
0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
70th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
67th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Serbia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0010.0010.0020.002198020012023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 70th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 67th of 205 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Serbia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Serbia ranks 70th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 67th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/serbia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/serbia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Serbia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.