Switzerland vs Viet Nam: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Switzerland
0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Viet Nam
0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland rank
43rd
Viet Nam rank
45th

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Switzerland
  • Viet Nam
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196519942023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Switzerland ranks 43rd and Viet Nam ranks 45th of 205 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Switzerland Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0031 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 0.0042 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s 0.0042 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 0.0045 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0042 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 0.0046 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0037 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 0.0042 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 0.0035 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0031 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Switzerland or Viet Nam?
Switzerland, at 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Viet Nam as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Switzerland and Viet Nam?
0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Viet Nam?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Switzerland and Viet Nam rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Switzerland ranks 43rd and Viet Nam ranks 45th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Switzerland vs Viet Nam: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/switzerland/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/switzerland/viet-nam/">Switzerland vs Viet Nam: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.