Iceland vs South Sudan: Fossil fuel energy consumption
Iceland
0.0%
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0%
in 2023
Iceland rank
3rd
South Sudan rank
3rd
Fossil fuel energy consumption over time
- Iceland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 176 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.4% | 31.8% | 26.4% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel energy consumption, Iceland or South Sudan?
- Iceland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel energy consumption between Iceland and South Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and South Sudan rank globally for fossil fuel energy consumption?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil fuel comprises coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas products.