Iceland vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Fossil fuel energy consumption
Iceland
0.0%
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0%
in 2024
Iceland rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Fossil fuel energy consumption over time
- Iceland
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28.3% | 43.3% | 15.1% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2000s | 19.3% | 45.5% | 26.2% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2010s | 6.5% | 25.8% | 19.3% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel energy consumption, Iceland or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Iceland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel energy consumption between Iceland and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for fossil fuel energy consumption?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil fuel comprises coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas products.