Malta vs Namibia: Fossil fuel energy consumption
Malta
0.0%
in 2023
Namibia
0.0%
in 2023
Malta rank
2nd
Namibia rank
2nd
Fossil fuel energy consumption over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 2nd and Namibia ranks 2nd of 175 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.2% | 61.6% | 36.6% | Malta |
| 2010s | 57.4% | 45.2% | 12.2% | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel energy consumption, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel energy consumption between Malta and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for fossil fuel energy consumption?
- Malta ranks 2nd and Namibia ranks 2nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil fuel comprises coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas products.