Afghanistan vs Nicaragua: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Afghanistan
0.5779
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.647
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
134th
Nicaragua rank
131st
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Afghanistan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.647 against 0.5779 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0691.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 134th and Nicaragua ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4804 | 15.14 | 14.66 | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0.5894 | 0.6208 | 0.0314 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Afghanistan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.647 against 0.5779 in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
- 0.0691, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Nicaragua rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Afghanistan ranks 134th and Nicaragua ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.