Angola vs Canada: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Angola
86.77
in 2024
Canada
79.84
in 2024
Angola rank
55th
Canada rank
57th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Angola
- Canada
How they compare
Angola currently reports 86.77 against 79.84 in Canada, a difference of 6.93.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Canada ahead.
Angola ranks 55th and Canada ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Canada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.34 | 76.36 | 25.02 | Canada |
| 2020s | 105.71 | 90.04 | 15.67 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Angola or Canada?
- Angola, at 86.77 against 79.84 in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Angola and Canada?
- 6.93, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Canada?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Canada rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Angola ranks 55th and Canada ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.