Angola vs Slovenia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Angola
86.77
in 2024
Slovenia
85.2
in 2023
Angola rank
55th
Slovenia rank
56th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Angola
- Slovenia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 86.77 against 85.2 in Slovenia, a difference of 1.57.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Slovenia ahead.
Angola ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.7 | 79.14 | 51.45 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 110.45 | 71.76 | 38.69 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Angola or Slovenia?
- Angola, at 86.77 against 85.2 in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Angola and Slovenia?
- 1.57, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Slovenia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Slovenia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Angola ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.