Angola vs Sweden: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Angola
86.77
in 2024
Sweden
97.76
in 2024
Angola rank
55th
Sweden rank
52nd
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Angola
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 97.76 against 86.77 in Angola, a difference of 10.99.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 55th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.34 | 203.37 | 152.03 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 105.71 | 151.26 | 45.54 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Angola or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 97.76 against 86.77 in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Angola and Sweden?
- 10.99, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sweden?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Sweden rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Angola ranks 55th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.