Bangladesh vs Chile: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Bangladesh
29.85
in 2024
Chile
30.98
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
75th
Chile rank
73rd
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 30.98 against 29.85 in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.13.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 75th and Chile ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.93 | 43.48 | 20.55 | Chile |
| 2020s | 58.9 | 62.07 | 3.17 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Bangladesh or Chile?
- Chile, at 30.98 against 29.85 in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Bangladesh and Chile?
- 1.13, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chile?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Chile rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 75th and Chile ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.